IMCV vs VYM

IMCV vs VYM

Which is better, IMCV or VYM?

Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. IMCV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VYM over 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. IMCV is less concentrated, with 13.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.8%.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: IMCV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIMCVVYM
Expense Ratio0.06%0.04%Best
AUM$1.2B$78.9B
Dividend Yield1.99%2.37%
Holdings273608
YTD Return+16.35%Best+11.83%
1Y Return+21.97%Best+15.96%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.89%Best+18.60%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.13%+11.51%Best
Volatility (annualized)18.4%14.6%Best
Max Drawdown-66.5%-58.8%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$16,200$17,241Best
Top 10 Weight13.2%Best25.8%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionJun 28, 2004Nov 10, 2006

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2006 to Oct 14, 2026 (19.9 years).

IMCV vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.9 years both funds cover.

IMCV vs VYM Performance

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF (IMCV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IMCV returned +21.97% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, IMCV is up 16.35% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.

Over three years, IMCV compounded at +18.89% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.13% and +11.51% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IMCV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +6.82%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IMCV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.5% for IMCV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IMCV charges 0.06% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $4 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMCV currently yields 1.99% against 2.37% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

IMCV already in VYM68.6%
VYM already in IMCV25.6%

68.6% of IMCV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 25.6% of VYM's money is in holdings IMCV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

155 positions in common, counted across the 270 positions we hold weights for in IMCV and 602 in VYM, against full books of 273 and 608.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 419 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for IMCV (72.5% of the fund), and 106 for IMCV that do not appear in VYM (29.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IMCVWeight in VYMDifference
VLOValero Energy1.71%0.43%1.28%
ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.1.53%0.46%1.07%
PSXPhillips 661.53%0.40%1.13%
USBUS Bancorp1.30%0.39%0.91%
PNCPnc Financial Services Group Inc.1.28%0.39%0.89%
MMM3m Co.1.23%0.36%0.87%
HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co1.25%0.28%0.97%
ELVElevance Health Inc1.16%0.33%0.83%
TRVThe Travelers Cos, Inc.1.10%0.31%0.79%
SLBSchlumberger Nv.1.05%0.36%0.69%

68.6% of IMCV is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IMCVVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IMCV or VYM?

IMCV has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IMCV or VYM?

Over the past year IMCV returned +21.97% vs +15.96% for VYM, so IMCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IMCV annualized +6.98% vs +6.82% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IMCV or VYM?

IMCV has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: IMCV -66.5% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both IMCV and VYM?

IMCV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between IMCV and VYM?

68.6% of IMCV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 25.6% of VYM's is in holdings IMCV also owns. They hold 155 positions in common, counted across the 270 positions we hold weights for in IMCV and 602 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, IMCV or VYM?

IMCV yields 1.99% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than IMCV?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. IMCV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VYM over 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. IMCV is less concentrated, with 13.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.