IQQ vs IVV

IQQ vs IVV

Which is better, IQQ or IVV?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.8%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIQQIVV
Expense Ratio0.10%0.03%Best
AUM$725M$896.5B
Dividend Yield0.08%1.10%
Holdings105508
YTD Return+0.82%+13.59%Best
1Y Return-+17.54%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.28%
Top 10 Weight46.8%38.9%Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 8, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IQQ vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IQQ vs IVV Performance

iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, IQQ is up 0.82% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IQQ charges 0.10% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IQQ currently yields 0.08% against 1.10% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

IQQ already in IVV92.1%
IVV already in IQQ55.5%

92.1% of IQQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 55.5% of IVV's money is in holdings IQQ also owns.

Most of IQQ is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

86 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in IQQ and 506 in IVV, against full books of 105 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 414 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IQQ (43.9% of the fund), and 8 for IQQ that do not appear in IVV (4.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IQQWeight in IVVDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.42%8.44%0.02%
AAPLApple, Inc7.30%7.29%0.01%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.76%5.76%0.00%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.05%3.68%0.37%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.5.17%1.87%3.30%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.00%3.00%0.00%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc4.19%1.52%2.67%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.26%2.42%0.84%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C2.80%2.41%0.39%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.47%2.47%0.00%

92.1% of IQQ is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IQQIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IQQ or IVV?

IQQ has an expense ratio of 0.10% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IQQ and IVV?

92.1% of IQQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 55.5% of IVV's is in holdings IQQ also owns. They hold 86 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in IQQ and 506 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, IQQ or IVV?

IQQ yields 0.08% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than IQQ?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.