ISHP vs QQQ
First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, ISHP or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ISHP is less concentrated, with 20.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ISHP | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.30% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 130 | 321 |
| YTD Return | -12.19% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | -14.22% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.99% | +26.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.45% | +15.42%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.6% | 19.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -42.7% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,746 | $20,484Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.5%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2016 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 11, 2016 to Oct 14, 2026 (10 years).
ISHP vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10 years both funds cover.
ISHP vs QQQ Performance
First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ISHP returned -14.22% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, ISHP is down 12.19% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, ISHP compounded at +11.99% per year against +26.18% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +1.45% and +15.42% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.41% annualized vs +6.26%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ISHP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.6% compared with 19.0% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.7% for ISHP and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ISHP charges 0.60% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $18 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ISHP currently yields 1.30% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
20.9% of ISHP's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 15.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings ISHP also owns.
ISHP and QQQ share little of their money.
12 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in ISHP and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 130 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 83 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for ISHP (82.0% of the fund), and 22 for ISHP that do not appear in QQQ (35.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ISHP | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.74% | 4.07% | 2.33% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.96% | 3.26% | 1.30% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.63% | 3.05% | 1.42% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.59% | 2.11% | 0.52% |
| SHOP:CAShopify Inc | 2.10% | 0.75% | 1.35% |
| PYPLPaypal Holdings Inc | 1.99% | 0.19% | 1.80% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 1.89% | 0.28% | 1.61% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 1.55% | 0.51% | 1.04% |
| DASHDoordash Inc - A | 1.68% | 0.31% | 1.37% |
| MELIMercadolibre Inc | 1.59% | 0.37% | 1.22% |
20.9% of ISHP is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ISHP or QQQ?
ISHP has an expense ratio of 0.60% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ISHP or QQQ?
Over the past year ISHP returned -14.22% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ISHP annualized +6.26% vs +20.41% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ISHP or QQQ?
ISHP has been the more volatile fund at 20.6% annualized versus 19.0% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: ISHP -42.7% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both ISHP and QQQ?
ISHP and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ISHP and QQQ?
20.9% of ISHP's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 15.2% of QQQ's is in holdings ISHP also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in ISHP and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, ISHP or QQQ?
ISHP yields 1.30% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so ISHP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than ISHP?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ISHP is less concentrated, with 20.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.