ISRA vs TAN
VanEck Israel ETF vs Invesco Solar ETF
Which is better, ISRA or TAN?
ISRA has been ahead.
ISRA has a lower expense ratio. ISRA led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ISRA is less concentrated, with 25.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ISRA | TAN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $155M | $888M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.31% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 162 | 91 |
| YTD Return | +8.98%Best | -17.36% |
| 1Y Return | +19.67%Best | -9.06% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.36%Best | -4.49% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.96%Best | -13.37% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6%Best | 37.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.0%Best | -78.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,999Best | $4,879 |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.4%Best | 59.9% |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2013 | Apr 15, 2008 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2013 to Oct 14, 2026 (13.3 years).
ISRA vs TAN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13.3 years both funds cover.
ISRA vs TAN Performance
VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) is an ETF from VanEck and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ISRA returned +19.67% while TAN returned -9.06%. Year to date, ISRA is up 8.98% versus a loss of 17.36% for TAN.
Over three years, ISRA compounded at +30.36% per year against -4.49% for TAN; over five years the annualized figures are +6.96% and -13.37% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, ISRA has the edge at +8.56% annualized vs +5.68%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.9% compared with 17.6% for ISRA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.0% for ISRA and -78.6% for TAN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ISRA charges 0.59% per year while TAN charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $70 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ISRA currently yields 1.31% against 0.00% for TAN.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 181 holdings in ISRA and 36 in TAN, totalling 99.7% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 181 positions we hold weights for in ISRA and 36 in TAN, against full books of 162 and 91.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 13 positions for TAN that do not appear in our book for ISRA (51.9% of the fund), and 3 for ISRA that do not appear in TAN (0.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ISRA and TAN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ISRA or TAN?
ISRA has an expense ratio of 0.59% while TAN charges 0.70%. ISRA is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ISRA or TAN?
Over the past year ISRA returned +19.67% vs -9.06% for TAN, so ISRA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), ISRA annualized +8.56% vs +5.68% for TAN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ISRA or TAN?
TAN has been the more volatile fund at 37.9% annualized versus 17.6% for ISRA. Worst drawdown: ISRA -45.0% vs TAN -78.6%.
Should I hold both ISRA and TAN?
ISRA and TAN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ISRA or TAN?
ISRA yields 1.31% while TAN yields 0.00%, so ISRA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TAN better than ISRA?
ISRA has a lower expense ratio. ISRA led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ISRA is less concentrated, with 25.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.