ITAN vs QQQ
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, ITAN or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ITAN led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ITAN is less concentrated, with 22.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ITAN | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $121M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 157 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +19.00% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +28.38%Best | +22.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.36% | +26.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.65% | +15.42%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4%Best | 20.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.4%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,141 | $20,484Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.8%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | Sparkline Capital | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).
ITAN vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
ITAN vs QQQ Performance
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) is an ETF from Sparkline Capital and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ITAN returned +28.38% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, ITAN is up 19.00% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, ITAN compounded at +24.36% per year against +26.18% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.65% and +15.42% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 17.4% for ITAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.4% for ITAN and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ITAN charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ITAN currently yields 1.01% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
22.0% of ITAN's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 18.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings ITAN also owns.
ITAN and QQQ share little of their money.
16 positions in common, counted across the 154 positions we hold weights for in ITAN and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 157 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 77 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for ITAN (77.9% of the fund), and 131 for ITAN that do not appear in QQQ (75.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ITAN | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.15% | 4.07% | 1.08% |
| INTCIntel Corp. | 3.80% | 2.64% | 1.16% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.01% | 1.77% | 0.24% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc-cl A | 0.55% | 3.05% | 2.50% |
| GOOGAlphabet, Inc.- Cl C | 0.55% | 2.85% | 2.30% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 1.91% | 0.81% | 1.10% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.33% |
| ADBEAdobe Inc | 1.16% | 0.40% | 0.76% |
| HONHoneywell International Inc | 1.02% | 0.28% | 0.74% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp. Class A | 0.89% | 0.32% | 0.57% |
22.0% of ITAN is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ITAN or QQQ?
ITAN has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ITAN or QQQ?
Over the past year ITAN returned +28.38% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so ITAN leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ITAN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 17.4% for ITAN. Worst drawdown: ITAN -30.4% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both ITAN and QQQ?
ITAN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ITAN and QQQ?
22.0% of ITAN's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 18.3% of QQQ's is in holdings ITAN also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 154 positions we hold weights for in ITAN and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, ITAN or QQQ?
ITAN yields 1.01% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so ITAN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than ITAN?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ITAN led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ITAN is less concentrated, with 22.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.