IVV vs KOID
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF
Which is better, IVV or KOID?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, KOID over the full window. KOID is less concentrated, with 21.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KOID |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.69% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $345M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.75% |
| Holdings | 508 | 60 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | +2.89% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | +8.14% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.6%Best | 31.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -22.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $13,319 | $13,415Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9% | 21.6%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | KraneShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 1, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
IVV vs KOID growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs KOID Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF (KOID) is an ETF from KraneShares. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while KOID returned +8.14%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 2.89% for KOID.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KOID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.2% compared with 11.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -22.9% for KOID. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KOID charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $69 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.75% for KOID.
Holdings Overlap
11.4% of IVV's money is in holdings KOID also owns. 24.9% of KOID's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
KOID and IVV share little of their money.
12 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 50 in KOID, against full books of 508 and 60.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for KOID that do not appear in our book for IVV (20.4% of the fund), and 489 for IVV that do not appear in KOID (88.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in KOID | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 2.12% | 6.32% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.51% | 2.00% | 0.49% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.39% | 2.12% | 1.73% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.30% | 2.14% | 1.84% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 0.32% | 2.11% | 1.79% |
| TERTeradyne Inc - Common | 0.10% | 2.26% | 2.16% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 0.10% | 2.16% | 2.06% |
| TELTe Connectivity Ltd. | 0.10% | 2.05% | 1.95% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 0.09% | 2.04% | 1.95% |
| TDYTeledyne Technologies Inc | 0.04% | 2.00% | 1.96% |
24.9% of KOID is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KOID?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KOID charges 0.69%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or KOID?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +8.14% for KOID, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +22.72% vs +23.35% for KOID. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or KOID?
KOID has been the more volatile fund at 31.2% annualized versus 11.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs KOID -22.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and KOID?
IVV and KOID have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KOID?
24.9% of KOID's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 24.9% of KOID's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 50 in KOID.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KOID?
IVV yields 1.10% while KOID yields 0.75%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KOID better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, KOID over the full window. KOID is less concentrated, with 21.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.