IVV vs KOOL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
Which is better, IVV or KOOL?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KOOL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.93% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $60M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 508 | 42 |
| YTD Return | +13.59% | +15.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | +16.89% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.6%Best | 12.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -20.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $15,215Best | $14,826 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 42.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | North Shore Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 1, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
IVV vs KOOL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs KOOL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) is an ETF from North Shore Indices. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while KOOL returned +16.89%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 15.54% for KOOL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KOOL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 11.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -20.6% for KOOL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KOOL charges 0.93%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $93 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.43% for KOOL.
Holdings Overlap
37.5% of IVV's money is in holdings KOOL also owns. 66.4% of KOOL's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
28 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 44 in KOOL, against full books of 508 and 42.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 12 positions for KOOL that do not appear in our book for IVV (26.6% of the fund), and 472 for IVV that do not appear in KOOL (62.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in KOOL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 5.78% | 2.66% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.29% | 4.31% | 2.98% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 3.11% | 2.65% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.68% | 4.34% | 0.66% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.00% | 3.65% | 0.65% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.42% | 3.20% | 0.78% |
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 0.15% | 4.75% | 4.60% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 1.97% | 0.50% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.94% | 2.58% | 1.64% |
| VLOValero Energy | 0.18% | 3.34% | 3.16% |
66.4% of KOOL is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KOOL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KOOL charges 0.93%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $90 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or KOOL?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +16.89% for KOOL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or KOOL?
KOOL has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 11.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs KOOL -20.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and KOOL?
IVV and KOOL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KOOL?
66.4% of KOOL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 66.4% of KOOL's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 44 in KOOL.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KOOL?
IVV yields 1.10% while KOOL yields 0.43%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KOOL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.