IVV vs NDEC

IVV vs NDEC

Which is better, IVV or NDEC?

Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVNDEC
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.79%
AUM$896.5B$62M
Dividend Yield1.10%0.00%
Holdings50818
YTD Return+13.59%Best+11.95%
1Y Return+17.54%Best+14.65%
3Y Return (annualized)+22.46%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.28%-
Volatility (annualized)12.3%8.7%Best
Max Drawdown-18.8%-13.0%Best
$10,000 over 1.9 years$13,126Best$12,752
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Innovator ETFs Trust
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendOption Writing
InceptionMay 15, 2000Nov 29, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).

IVV vs NDEC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.

IVV vs NDEC Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - December (NDEC) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while NDEC returned +14.65%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 11.95% for NDEC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 8.7% for NDEC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -13.0% for NDEC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while NDEC charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for NDEC.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and NDEC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVNDEC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or NDEC?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NDEC charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or NDEC?

Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +14.65% for NDEC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +15.39% vs +13.65% for NDEC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or NDEC?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 8.7% for NDEC. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs NDEC -13.0%.

Should I hold both IVV and NDEC?

IVV and NDEC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NDEC?

IVV yields 1.10% while NDEC yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NDEC better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.