IVV vs OEFA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs O Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF
Which is better, IVV or OEFA?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. OEFA is less concentrated, with 30.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OEFA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.48% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $34M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.65% |
| Holdings | 508 | 51 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | +4.36% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | +6.88% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -13.5% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,584Best | $10,552 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9% | 30.0%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ALPS Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 18, 2015 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
IVV vs OEFA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs OEFA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and O Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while OEFA returned +6.88%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 4.36% for OEFA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OEFA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 13.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -13.5% for OEFA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OEFA charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $48 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.65% for OEFA.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 506 holdings in IVV and 51 in OEFA, totalling 99.9% and 99.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 51 in OEFA, against full books of 508 and 51.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for OEFA that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.1% of the fund), and 500 for IVV that do not appear in OEFA (99.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and OEFA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OEFA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OEFA charges 0.48%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or OEFA?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +6.88% for OEFA, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +15.84% vs +5.52% for OEFA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or OEFA?
OEFA has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 13.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs OEFA -13.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and OEFA?
IVV and OEFA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OEFA?
IVV yields 1.10% while OEFA yields 1.65%, so OEFA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OEFA better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. OEFA is less concentrated, with 30.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.