IVV vs OGIG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF
Which is better, IVV or OGIG?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OGIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.48% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $106M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.08% |
| Holdings | 508 | 55 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | -2.92% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | -10.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46%Best | +16.94% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28%Best | -2.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6%Best | 25.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -66.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,654Best | $9,039 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 45.0% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ALPS Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 5, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.4 years).
IVV vs OGIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs OGIG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while OGIG returned -10.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a loss of 2.92% for OGIG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.46% per year against +16.94% for OGIG; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and -2.00% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.14% annualized vs +8.63%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OGIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.6% compared with 16.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -66.0% for OGIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OGIG charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $48 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.08% for OGIG.
Holdings Overlap
19.3% of IVV's money is in holdings OGIG also owns. 62.5% of OGIG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
27 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 51 in OGIG, against full books of 508 and 55.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 14 positions for OGIG that do not appear in our book for IVV (23.8% of the fund), and 473 for IVV that do not appear in OGIG (80.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in OGIG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 6.05% | 0.29% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.68% | 5.75% | 2.07% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.00% | 5.94% | 2.94% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.42% | 6.50% | 4.08% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.66% | 5.05% | 4.39% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 0.36% | 4.03% | 3.67% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 0.49% | 3.13% | 2.64% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 0.41% | 3.06% | 2.65% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 0.14% | 2.35% | 2.21% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 0.12% | 2.03% | 1.91% |
62.5% of OGIG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OGIG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OGIG charges 0.48%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or OGIG?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs -10.78% for OGIG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +14.14% vs +8.63% for OGIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or OGIG?
OGIG has been the more volatile fund at 25.6% annualized versus 16.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs OGIG -66.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and OGIG?
IVV and OGIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OGIG?
62.5% of OGIG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 62.5% of OGIG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 51 in OGIG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OGIG?
IVV yields 1.10% while OGIG yields 0.08%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OGIG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.