IVV vs PWRZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF
Which is better, IVV or PWRZ?
Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PWRZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.76% |
| Holdings | 508 | 48 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | -5.83% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 63.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | TrueShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 8, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs PWRZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs PWRZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) is an ETF from TrueShares. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a loss of 5.83% for PWRZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PWRZ charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.76% for PWRZ.
Holdings Overlap
0.5% of IVV's money is in holdings PWRZ also owns. 22.7% of PWRZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
PWRZ and IVV share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 24 in PWRZ, against full books of 508 and 48.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for PWRZ that do not appear in our book for IVV (19.8% of the fund), and 495 for IVV that do not appear in PWRZ (98.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
22.7% of PWRZ is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PWRZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PWRZ charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PWRZ?
22.7% of PWRZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 22.7% of PWRZ's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 24 in PWRZ.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PWRZ?
IVV yields 1.10% while PWRZ yields 1.76%, so PWRZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PWRZ better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.