IVV vs PWZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
Which is better, IVV or PWZ?
Large Cap Blend against Municipal California.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PWZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.28% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 4.07% |
| Holdings | 508 | 2,504 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | -4.44% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | -3.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46%Best | +2.30% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28%Best | -1.08% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 7.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -24.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,654Best | $9,472 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Municipal California |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 11, 2007 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 11, 2007 to Oct 14, 2026 (19 years).
IVV vs PWZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs PWZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while PWZ returned -3.34%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a loss of 4.44% for PWZ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.46% per year against +2.30% for PWZ; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and -1.08% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.25% annualized vs +0.33%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 7.0% for PWZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -24.7% for PWZ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PWZ charges 0.28%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $28 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 4.07% for PWZ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 506 holdings in IVV and 482 in PWZ, totalling 99.9% and 31.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 482 in PWZ, against full books of 508 and 2,504.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and PWZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PWZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PWZ charges 0.28%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or PWZ?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs -3.34% for PWZ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), IVV annualized +9.25% vs +0.33% for PWZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or PWZ?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 7.0% for PWZ. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PWZ -24.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and PWZ?
IVV and PWZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PWZ?
IVV yields 1.10% while PWZ yields 4.07%, so PWZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PWZ better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.