IVV vs QQI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco Nasdaq International Innovators 100 ETF
Which is better, IVV or QQI?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.29% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $4M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 95 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | -2.93% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 23, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs QQI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs QQI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco Nasdaq International Innovators 100 ETF (QQI) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a loss of 2.93% for QQI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQI charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $29 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for QQI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 506 holdings in IVV and 95 in QQI, totalling 99.9% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 95 in QQI, against full books of 508 and 95.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for QQI that do not appear in our book for IVV (7.0% of the fund), and 500 for IVV that do not appear in QQI (99.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and QQI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQI charges 0.29%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQI?
IVV yields 1.10% while QQI yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.