IVV vs QQJG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
Which is better, IVV or QQJG?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. QQJG is less concentrated, with 27.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQJG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.20% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $7M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.69% |
| Holdings | 508 | 84 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5%Best | 19.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5%Best | -36.8% |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $15,945Best | $10,344 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9% | 27.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 27, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 233 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Oct 14, 2026 and QQJG through Feb 23, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 27, 2021 to Feb 23, 2026 (4.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQJG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 15.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -36.8% for QQJG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQJG charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.69% for QQJG.
Holdings Overlap
1.8% of IVV's money is in holdings QQJG also owns. 51.0% of QQJG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 366 days apart, IVV as of Oct 1, 2026 and QQJG as of Sep 30, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
36 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 88 in QQJG, against full books of 508 and 84.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 37 positions for QQJG that do not appear in our book for IVV (31.4% of the fund), and 465 for IVV that do not appear in QQJG (97.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in QQJG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| STXSeagate Technolo | 0.32% | 4.09% | 3.77% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp. | 0.25% | 3.51% | 3.26% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 0.10% | 3.27% | 3.17% |
| EBAYEbay Inc. | 0.06% | 2.72% | 2.66% |
| TSCOTractor Supply Co | 0.02% | 2.29% | 2.27% |
| SMCISuper Micro Computer Inc Common Stock Usd 0.001 | 0.04% | 2.23% | 2.19% |
| ULTAUlta Beauty Inc. | 0.03% | 2.01% | 1.98% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 0.06% | 1.92% | 1.86% |
| PTCPtc, Inc.(A) | 0.02% | 1.80% | 1.78% |
| TERTeradyne Inc - Common | 0.10% | 1.71% | 1.61% |
51.0% of QQJG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQJG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQJG charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQJG?
QQJG has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 15.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs QQJG -36.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQJG?
IVV and QQJG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQJG?
51.0% of QQJG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 51.0% of QQJG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 36 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 88 in QQJG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQJG?
IVV yields 1.10% while QQJG yields 0.69%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQJG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. QQJG is less concentrated, with 27.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.