IVV vs QQQG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
Which is better, IVV or QQQG?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQQG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $52M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.06% |
| Holdings | 508 | 104 |
| YTD Return | +13.59% | +27.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.54% | +29.28%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1%Best | 22.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -23.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $14,046 | $14,801Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 51.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 19, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
IVV vs QQQG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs QQQG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while QQQG returned +29.28%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 27.13% for QQQG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 12.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -23.6% for QQQG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQQG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.06% for QQQG.
Holdings Overlap
36.7% of IVV's money is in holdings QQQG also owns. 93.9% of QQQG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of QQQG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
48 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 50 in QQQG, against full books of 508 and 104.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for QQQG that do not appear in our book for IVV (6.0% of the fund), and 452 for IVV that do not appear in QQQG (62.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in QQQG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 1.13% | 7.31% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.29% | 1.53% | 5.76% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.52% | 5.74% | 4.22% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 1.19% | 4.57% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.87% | 4.97% | 3.10% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 0.39% | 6.29% | 5.90% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 0.35% | 6.03% | 5.68% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 0.14% | 5.33% | 5.19% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 0.17% | 5.04% | 4.87% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 0.49% | 4.38% | 3.89% |
93.9% of QQQG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQQG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQQG charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or QQQG?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +29.28% for QQQG, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +17.56% vs +20.53% for QQQG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQQG?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 12.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs QQQG -23.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQQG?
IVV and QQQG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQQG?
93.9% of QQQG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 93.9% of QQQG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 50 in QQQG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQQG?
IVV yields 1.10% while QQQG yields 0.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.