IVV vs REMG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or REMG?
REMG has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. REMG led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | REMG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.64% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $121M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.11% |
| Holdings | 508 | 410 |
| YTD Return | +13.59% | +15.62%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.54% | +25.48%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.6%Best | 20.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -14.1% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $13,362 | $14,804Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 29, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
IVV vs REMG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs REMG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF (REMG) is an ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while REMG returned +25.48%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 15.62% for REMG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
REMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 11.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -14.1% for REMG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while REMG charges 0.64%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $64 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.11% for REMG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 10.9% of IVV's money is in holdings REMG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for REMG, our book for it covers 87.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and REMG share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 386 in REMG, against full books of 508 and 410.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and REMG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or REMG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while REMG charges 0.64%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or REMG?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +25.48% for REMG, so REMG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +23.00% vs +32.34% for REMG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or REMG?
REMG has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 11.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs REMG -14.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and REMG?
IVV and REMG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and REMG?
At least 10.9% of IVV's money is in holdings REMG also owns. Our book for REMG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 386 in REMG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or REMG?
IVV yields 1.10% while REMG yields 1.11%, so REMG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is REMG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. REMG led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.