IVV vs RHRX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Adaptive Tactical Rotation ETF
Which is better, IVV or RHRX?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, RHRX over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RHRX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.38% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $58M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 7 |
| YTD Return | +13.59% | +18.42%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.54% | +20.13%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46%Best | +21.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28%Best | +8.64% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6%Tie | 15.6%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5%Best | -25.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,654Best | $15,134 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Adaptive ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 20, 2012 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 8, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.9 years).
IVV vs RHRX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RHRX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Adaptive Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) is an ETF from Adaptive ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while RHRX returned +20.13%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 18.42% for RHRX.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.46% per year against +21.18% for RHRX; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +8.64% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV and RHRX have been equally volatile, both at 15.6% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -25.3% for RHRX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RHRX charges 1.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $138 annually, a gap of $135 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for RHRX.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 506 holdings in IVV and 6 in RHRX, totalling 99.9% and 100.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 6 in RHRX, against full books of 508 and 7.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for RHRX that do not appear in our book for IVV (100.6% of the fund), and 500 for IVV that do not appear in RHRX (99.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RHRX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RHRX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RHRX charges 1.38%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $135 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RHRX?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +20.13% for RHRX, so RHRX leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RHRX?
IVV and RHRX have been equally volatile, both at 15.6% annualized. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs RHRX -25.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and RHRX?
IVV and RHRX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RHRX?
IVV yields 1.10% while RHRX yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RHRX better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, RHRX over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.