IVV vs RINT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or RINT?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. RINT is less concentrated, with 12.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RINT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $156M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.81% |
| Holdings | 508 | 364 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | +7.35% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | +14.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.6%Best | 12.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -11.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $13,284Best | $12,593 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9% | 12.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 13, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
IVV vs RINT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RINT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) is an ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while RINT returned +14.43%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 7.35% for RINT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RINT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 11.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -11.9% for RINT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RINT charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.81% for RINT.
Holdings Overlap
0.4% of IVV's money is in holdings RINT also owns. 0.3% of RINT's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 328 in RINT, against full books of 508 and 364.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for RINT that do not appear in our book for IVV (1.4% of the fund), and 498 for IVV that do not appear in RINT (99.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RINT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RINT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RINT charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RINT?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +14.43% for RINT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +22.49% vs +17.90% for RINT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RINT?
RINT has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 11.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs RINT -11.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and RINT?
IVV and RINT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RINT?
IVV yields 1.10% while RINT yields 0.81%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RINT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. RINT is less concentrated, with 12.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.