IVV vs ROAM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
Which is better, IVV or ROAM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, ROAM over 1Y. ROAM is less concentrated, with 11.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ROAM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.44% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $109M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 508 | 364 |
| YTD Return | +13.59% | +19.78%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.54% | +29.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46%Best | +21.80% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28%Best | +11.33% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0%Best | 16.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -48.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,654Best | $17,103 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9% | 11.0%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Hartford Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 25, 2015 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 26, 2015 to Oct 14, 2026 (11.6 years).
IVV vs ROAM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs ROAM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) is an ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while ROAM returned +29.42%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 19.78% for ROAM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.46% per year against +21.80% for ROAM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +11.33% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.49% annualized vs +4.64%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROAM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 15.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -48.6% for ROAM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ROAM charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $44 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.37% for ROAM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 506 holdings in IVV and 332 in ROAM, totalling 99.9% and 98.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 332 in ROAM, against full books of 508 and 364.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for ROAM that do not appear in our book for IVV (2.6% of the fund), and 500 for IVV that do not appear in ROAM (99.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and ROAM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ROAM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ROAM charges 0.44%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or ROAM?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +29.42% for ROAM, so ROAM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IVV annualized +12.49% vs +4.64% for ROAM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or ROAM?
ROAM has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 15.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs ROAM -48.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and ROAM?
IVV and ROAM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ROAM?
IVV yields 1.10% while ROAM yields 2.37%, so ROAM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ROAM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, ROAM over 1Y. ROAM is less concentrated, with 11.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.