IVV vs RSPU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
Which is better, IVV or RSPU?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RSPU is less concentrated, with 33.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RSPU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.40% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $510M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.92% |
| Holdings | 508 | 68 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | -0.04% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | -4.09% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46%Best | +15.70% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28%Best | +9.71% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -51.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,654Best | $15,894 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9% | 33.2%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 1, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2006 to Oct 14, 2026 (19.9 years).
IVV vs RSPU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RSPU Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while RSPU returned -4.09%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a loss of 0.04% for RSPU.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.46% per year against +15.70% for RSPU; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +9.71% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.43% annualized vs +5.89%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 14.6% for RSPU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -51.3% for RSPU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RSPU charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $40 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.92% for RSPU.
Holdings Overlap
1.9% of IVV's money is in holdings RSPU also owns. 100.0% of RSPU's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of RSPU is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
31 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 32 in RSPU, against full books of 508 and 68.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for RSPU that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.1% of the fund), and 469 for IVV that do not appear in RSPU (97.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RSPU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AESA E S Corporation, The | 0.02% | 3.46% | 3.44% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 0.24% | 3.20% | 2.96% |
| PNWPinnacle West Corp | 0.02% | 3.39% | 3.37% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 0.15% | 3.26% | 3.11% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 0.10% | 3.30% | 3.20% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 0.13% | 3.26% | 3.13% |
| EVRGEvergy Inc. | 0.03% | 3.35% | 3.32% |
| EDConsolidated Edison Inc | 0.06% | 3.31% | 3.25% |
| WECWec Energy Group Inc. | 0.05% | 3.29% | 3.24% |
| DDominion Energy Inc. | 0.08% | 3.24% | 3.16% |
100.0% of RSPU is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RSPU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RSPU charges 0.40%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RSPU?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs -4.09% for RSPU, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +9.43% vs +5.89% for RSPU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RSPU?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 14.6% for RSPU. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RSPU -51.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and RSPU?
IVV and RSPU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RSPU?
100.0% of RSPU's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 100.0% of RSPU's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 32 in RSPU.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RSPU?
IVV yields 1.10% while RSPU yields 2.92%, so RSPU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSPU better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RSPU is less concentrated, with 33.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.