IVV vs STXM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Strive Mid Cap ETF
Which is better, IVV or STXM?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, STXM over 1Y. STXM is less concentrated, with 6.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | STXM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $16M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 508 | 407 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.7%Best | 14.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -23.8% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $12,710Best | $11,764 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9% | 6.7%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Strive Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 11, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 201 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Oct 14, 2026 and STXM through Mar 27, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 10, 2024 to Mar 27, 2026 (2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
STXM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 11.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -23.8% for STXM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while STXM charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.04% for STXM.
Holdings Overlap
1.9% of IVV's money is in holdings STXM also owns. 20.0% of STXM's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
STXM and IVV share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 244 days apart, IVV as of Oct 1, 2026 and STXM as of Jan 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
58 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 395 in STXM, against full books of 508 and 407.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 320 positions for STXM that do not appear in our book for IVV (73.0% of the fund), and 441 for IVV that do not appear in STXM (97.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in STXM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 0.39% | 0.75% | 0.36% |
| PSTGPure Storage Inc | 0.07% | 0.82% | 0.75% |
| BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A | 0.12% | 0.75% | 0.63% |
| CIENCiena Corp | 0.08% | 0.71% | 0.63% |
| COHRCoherent, Inc | 0.09% | 0.54% | 0.45% |
| CASYCaseys General | 0.03% | 0.53% | 0.50% |
| KEYKeycorp | 0.03% | 0.53% | 0.50% |
| CHRWCh Robinson Worldwide Inc. | 0.03% | 0.50% | 0.47% |
| SNASnap-on Inc (sna Un) | 0.03% | 0.48% | 0.45% |
| PNRPentair Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.01% | 0.49% | 0.48% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and STXM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or STXM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while STXM charges 0.18%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or STXM?
STXM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 11.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs STXM -23.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and STXM?
IVV and STXM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and STXM?
20.0% of STXM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 20.0% of STXM's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 58 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 395 in STXM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or STXM?
IVV yields 1.10% while STXM yields 1.04%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is STXM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, STXM over 1Y. STXM is less concentrated, with 6.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.