IVV vs TSLG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
Which is better, IVV or TSLG?
Large Cap Blend against Leverage Strategy.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TSLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.80% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $50M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 13.55% |
| Holdings | 508 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +13.90%Best | -47.23% |
| 1Y Return | +17.37%Best | -50.13% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.55% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.17% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3%Best | 98.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -82.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $13,012Best | $3,124 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Leverage Shares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Leverage Strategy |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 13, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026 (1.8 years).
IVV vs TSLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TSLG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +17.37% while TSLG returned -50.13%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.90% versus a loss of 47.23% for TSLG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TSLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 98.4% compared with 12.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -82.9% for TSLG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TSLG charges 0.80%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $80 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 13.55% for TSLG.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TSLG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TSLG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TSLG charges 0.80%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TSLG?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.37% vs -50.13% for TSLG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +15.75% vs -47.61% for TSLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TSLG?
TSLG has been the more volatile fund at 98.4% annualized versus 12.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs TSLG -82.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and TSLG?
IVV and TSLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TSLG?
IVV yields 1.10% while TSLG yields 13.55%, so TSLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TSLG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.