IVV vs TXBC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs 21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 ex-BTC Index ETF
Which is better, IVV or TXBC?
Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TXBC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.34% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 13 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | -22.78% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | -27.73% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | 21Shares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 13, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs TXBC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs TXBC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and 21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 ex-BTC Index ETF (TXBC) is an ETF from 21Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while TXBC returned -27.73%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a loss of 22.78% for TXBC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TXBC charges 1.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $134 annually, a gap of $131 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for TXBC.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 506 holdings in IVV and 9 in TXBC, totalling 99.9% and 98.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 9 in TXBC, against full books of 508 and 13.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 5 positions for TXBC that do not appear in our book for IVV (77.9% of the fund), and 500 for IVV that do not appear in TXBC (99.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TXBC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TXBC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TXBC charges 1.34%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $131 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TXBC?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs -27.73% for TXBC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TXBC?
IVV yields 1.10% while TXBC yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TXBC better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.