IVV vs UTSL

IVV vs UTSL

Which is better, IVV or UTSL?

Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, UTSL over 3Y.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVUTSL
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.97%
AUM$896.5B$74M
Dividend Yield1.10%3.18%
Holdings50880
YTD Return+13.59%Best-16.57%
1Y Return+17.54%Best-31.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+22.46%+25.69%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+13.28%Best+4.09%
Volatility (annualized)15.8%Best48.3%
Max Drawdown-33.9%Best-79.5%
$10,000 over 5 years$18,654Best$12,219
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Direxion Shares ETF Trust
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000May 3, 2017

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 3, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.4 years).

IVV vs UTSL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.4 years both funds cover.

IVV vs UTSL Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X ETF (UTSL) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while UTSL returned -31.12%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a loss of 16.57% for UTSL.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.46% per year against +25.69% for UTSL; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +4.09% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.13% annualized vs +4.65%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UTSL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 48.3% compared with 15.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -79.5% for UTSL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while UTSL charges 0.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $97 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 3.18% for UTSL.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in UTSL1.9%

At least 1.9% of IVV's money is in holdings UTSL also owns.

Stated as a floor: for UTSL, our book for it covers 33.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

IVV and UTSL share little of their money.

31 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 34 in UTSL, against full books of 508 and 80.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in UTSLDifference
NEENextera Energy, Inc.0.24%2.65%2.41%
SOSouthern Co/The0.15%1.60%1.45%
DUKDuke Energy Corp0.13%1.47%1.34%
CEGConstellation Energy Corp0.13%1.42%1.29%
AEPAmerican Electric Power Co. Inc.0.10%1.08%0.98%
DDominion Energy Inc0.08%0.89%0.81%
SRESempra Common Stock0.08%0.85%0.77%
ETREntergy Corp0.07%0.78%0.71%
VSTVistra Energy Corp.0.07%0.73%0.66%
XELXcel Energy Inc Common Stock Usd 2.50.07%0.73%0.66%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and UTSL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVUTSL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or UTSL?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while UTSL charges 0.97%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $94 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or UTSL?

Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs -31.12% for UTSL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +14.13% vs +4.65% for UTSL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or UTSL?

UTSL has been the more volatile fund at 48.3% annualized versus 15.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs UTSL -79.5%.

Should I hold both IVV and UTSL?

IVV and UTSL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and UTSL?

At least 1.9% of IVV's money is in holdings UTSL also owns. Our book for UTSL is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 34 in UTSL.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or UTSL?

IVV yields 1.10% while UTSL yields 3.18%, so UTSL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is UTSL better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, UTSL over 3Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.