IVV vs VBCD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Vanguard Target Maturity 2030 Corporate Bond ETF
Which is better, IVV or VBCD?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VBCD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.08% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $60M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.57% |
| Holdings | 508 | 673 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | +0.09% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | - |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 10, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs VBCD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs VBCD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Target Maturity 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCD) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 0.09% for VBCD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VBCD charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $8 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.57% for VBCD.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings VBCD also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VBCD, our book for it covers 83.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 553 in VBCD, against full books of 508 and 673.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in VBCD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 0.12% | 1.08% | 0.96% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and VBCD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VBCD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VBCD charges 0.08%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VBCD?
IVV yields 1.10% while VBCD yields 1.57%, so VBCD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VBCD better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.