IVV vs VGSR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF
Which is better, IVV or VGSR?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VGSR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.45% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $480M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.97% |
| Holdings | 508 | 306 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | +3.94% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | +4.16% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.7%Best | 13.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -18.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $17,645Best | $12,561 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 45.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vert Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 31, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 4, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
IVV vs VGSR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs VGSR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF (VGSR) is an ETF from Vert Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while VGSR returned +4.16%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 3.94% for VGSR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VGSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.7% compared with 11.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -18.3% for VGSR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VGSR charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.97% for VGSR.
Holdings Overlap
1.3% of IVV's money is in holdings VGSR also owns. 58.3% of VGSR's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
21 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 150 in VGSR, against full books of 508 and 306.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 29 positions for VGSR that do not appear in our book for IVV (11.1% of the fund), and 479 for IVV that do not appear in VGSR (98.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in VGSR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 0.25% | 5.02% | 4.77% |
| SPGSimon Property Group Inc | 0.10% | 5.03% | 4.93% |
| EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 0.15% | 4.97% | 4.82% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 0.09% | 4.96% | 4.87% |
| PLDPrologis Inc | 0.18% | 4.83% | 4.65% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corporation | 0.11% | 4.78% | 4.67% |
| EQRVivmark Residential | 0.07% | 4.47% | 4.40% |
| VTRVentas Inc . | 0.06% | 4.32% | 4.26% |
| IRMIron Mtn Inc New Com Npv | 0.05% | 3.43% | 3.38% |
| EXRExtra Space Storage Inc | 0.04% | 2.92% | 2.88% |
58.3% of VGSR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VGSR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VGSR charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or VGSR?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +4.16% for VGSR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or VGSR?
VGSR has been the more volatile fund at 13.7% annualized versus 11.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs VGSR -18.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and VGSR?
IVV and VGSR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VGSR?
58.3% of VGSR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 58.3% of VGSR's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 150 in VGSR.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VGSR?
IVV yields 1.10% while VGSR yields 2.97%, so VGSR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VGSR better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.