IVV vs WAMA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund ETF
Which is better, IVV or WAMA?
Large Cap Blend against Allocation/Balanced.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WAMA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.32% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $206M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.58% |
| Holdings | 508 | 1,012 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | +10.52% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 40.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Allocation/Balanced |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 12, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs WAMA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs WAMA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund ETF (WAMA) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 10.52% for WAMA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WAMA charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $32 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.58% for WAMA.
Holdings Overlap
92.3% of IVV's money is in holdings WAMA also owns. 95.3% of WAMA's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of WAMA is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
416 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 504 in WAMA, against full books of 508 and 1,012.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 65 positions for WAMA that do not appear in our book for IVV (1.9% of the fund), and 85 for IVV that do not appear in WAMA (7.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in WAMA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 7.81% | 0.63% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.29% | 7.50% | 0.21% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 5.56% | 0.20% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.00% | 6.27% | 3.27% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.68% | 3.87% | 0.19% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.42% | 2.44% | 0.02% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 2.26% | 0.21% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.87% | 1.48% | 0.39% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.51% | 1.57% | 0.06% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.41% | 1.64% | 0.23% |
95.3% of WAMA is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WAMA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WAMA charges 0.32%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WAMA?
95.3% of WAMA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 95.3% of WAMA's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 416 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 504 in WAMA.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WAMA?
IVV yields 1.10% while WAMA yields 0.58%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WAMA better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.