IVV vs WMSB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Weitz Multisector Bond ETF
Which is better, IVV or WMSB?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WMSB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $27M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 5.06% |
| Holdings | 508 | 189 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | -0.07% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | +1.56% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Weitz Investment Management, Inc |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | - |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 4, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs WMSB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs WMSB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Weitz Multisector Bond ETF (WMSB) is an ETF from Weitz Investment Management, Inc. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while WMSB returned +1.56%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a loss of 0.07% for WMSB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WMSB charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 5.06% for WMSB.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 506 holdings in IVV and 24 in WMSB, totalling 99.9% and 28.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 24 in WMSB, against full books of 508 and 189.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and WMSB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WMSB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WMSB charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or WMSB?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +1.56% for WMSB, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WMSB?
IVV yields 1.10% while WMSB yields 5.06%, so WMSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WMSB better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.