IVV vs WQTM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund ETF
Which is better, IVV or WQTM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WQTM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.45% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $330M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 56 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | +6.29% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | -9.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2%Best | 48.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -31.1% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,575Best | $9,403 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 9, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 9, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
IVV vs WQTM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs WQTM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund ETF (WQTM) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while WQTM returned -9.36%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 6.29% for WQTM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WQTM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 48.0% compared with 13.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -31.1% for WQTM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WQTM charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for WQTM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 23.4% of IVV's money is in holdings WQTM also owns.
Stated as a floor: for WQTM, our book for it covers 92.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and WQTM share little of their money.
15 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 46 in WQTM, against full books of 508 and 56.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in WQTM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 3.17% | 5.27% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 3.32% | 2.44% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.68% | 3.38% | 0.30% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 0.32% | 5.40% | 5.08% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 0.90% | 1.90% | 1.00% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.52% | 1.04% | 0.48% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.65% | 1.60% | 0.95% |
| KEYSKeysight Technologies Inc. | 0.10% | 1.59% | 1.49% |
| SNPSSynopsys | 0.14% | 1.52% | 1.38% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 0.09% | 1.48% | 1.39% |
23.4% of IVV is already inside WQTM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WQTM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WQTM charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or WQTM?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs -9.36% for WQTM, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +15.75% vs -5.97% for WQTM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or WQTM?
WQTM has been the more volatile fund at 48.0% annualized versus 13.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs WQTM -31.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and WQTM?
IVV and WQTM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WQTM?
At least 23.4% of IVV's money is in holdings WQTM also owns. Our book for WQTM is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 46 in WQTM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WQTM?
IVV yields 1.10% while WQTM yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WQTM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.