IVV vs XBNB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF
Which is better, IVV or XBNB?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XBNB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.89% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $331,926.8 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.01% |
| Holdings | 508 | 6 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Teucrium |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | - |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 28, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 12 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Oct 14, 2026 and XBNB through Oct 2, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XBNB charges 1.89%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $189 annually, a gap of $186 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.01% for XBNB.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and XBNB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XBNB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XBNB charges 1.89%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $186 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XBNB?
IVV yields 1.10% while XBNB yields 0.01%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XBNB better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.