IVV vs XOVR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Which is better, IVV or XOVR?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.81% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | +6.41% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | +1.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46%Best | +22.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28%Best | +5.66% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2%Best | 24.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -56.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,654Best | $13,169 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ERShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 7, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 8, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.9 years).
IVV vs XOVR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs XOVR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) is an ETF from ERShares. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while XOVR returned +1.58%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 6.41% for XOVR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.46% per year against +22.10% for XOVR; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +5.66% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.94% annualized vs +10.79%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XOVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.0% compared with 16.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -56.3% for XOVR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XOVR charges 1.81%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $181 annually, a gap of $178 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for XOVR.
Holdings Overlap
At least 17.5% of IVV's money is in holdings XOVR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for XOVR, our book for it covers 77.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and XOVR share little of their money.
15 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 30 in XOVR, against full books of 508 and 33.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in XOVR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 9.73% | 1.29% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.00% | 5.74% | 2.74% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.42% | 4.78% | 2.36% |
| VEEVVeeva Systems Inc | 0.06% | 3.64% | 3.58% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.87% | 1.70% | 0.17% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 0.17% | 3.33% | 3.16% |
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 0.13% | 3.34% | 3.21% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 0.32% | 2.97% | 2.65% |
| DASHDoordash Inc - A | 0.10% | 2.75% | 2.65% |
| RDDTReddit Inc-Cl A | 0.03% | 2.77% | 2.74% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and XOVR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XOVR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XOVR charges 1.81%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $178 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or XOVR?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +1.58% for XOVR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +13.94% vs +10.79% for XOVR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or XOVR?
XOVR has been the more volatile fund at 24.0% annualized versus 16.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs XOVR -56.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and XOVR?
IVV and XOVR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XOVR?
At least 17.5% of IVV's money is in holdings XOVR also owns. Our book for XOVR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 30 in XOVR.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XOVR?
IVV yields 1.10% while XOVR yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XOVR better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.