IVV vs XUDV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Franklin US Dividend Booster Index ETF
Which is better, IVV or XUDV?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. XUDV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XUDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.09% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $76M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 3.23% |
| Holdings | 508 | 97 |
| YTD Return | +14.84% | +20.81%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.70% | +25.84%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.93% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.91% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6% | 11.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -16.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $12,987 | $13,177Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1%Best | 44.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 21, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 23, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026 (1.7 years).
IVV vs XUDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
IVV vs XUDV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Franklin US Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year IVV returned +18.70% while XUDV returned +25.84%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.84% versus a gain of 20.81% for XUDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 11.5% for XUDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -16.0% for XUDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XUDV charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $9 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 3.23% for XUDV.
Holdings Overlap
15.3% of IVV's money is in holdings XUDV also owns. 95.9% of XUDV's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of XUDV is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
83 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 92 in XUDV, against full books of 508 and 97.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for XUDV that do not appear in our book for IVV (3.8% of the fund), and 414 for IVV that do not appear in XUDV (84.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in XUDV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFEPfizer Inc | 0.24% | 5.09% | 4.85% |
| VZVerizon Communications Inc Vz | 0.32% | 4.80% | 4.48% |
| HPQHP Inc | 0.05% | 4.65% | 4.60% |
| KHCKraft Heinz Co. | 0.03% | 4.61% | 4.58% |
| BBYBest Buy Co Inc | 0.03% | 4.59% | 4.56% |
| UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc | 0.11% | 4.44% | 4.33% |
| GISGeneral Mills In | 0.03% | 4.45% | 4.42% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 0.17% | 4.19% | 4.02% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 0.06% | 4.22% | 4.16% |
| OKEOneok | 0.09% | 3.76% | 3.67% |
95.9% of XUDV is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XUDV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XUDV charges 0.09%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or XUDV?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.70% vs +25.84% for XUDV, so XUDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +16.62% vs +17.62% for XUDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or XUDV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 11.5% for XUDV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs XUDV -16.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and XUDV?
IVV and XUDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XUDV?
95.9% of XUDV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 95.9% of XUDV's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 83 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 92 in XUDV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XUDV?
IVV yields 1.06% while XUDV yields 3.23%, so XUDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XUDV better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. XUDV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.