IVV vs XYLD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
Which is better, IVV or XYLD?
Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $3.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 10.44% |
| Holdings | 508 | 1,014 |
| YTD Return | +14.84%Best | +11.48% |
| 1Y Return | +18.70%Best | +18.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.93%Best | +13.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.91%Best | +7.93% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 11.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -34.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,178Best | $14,646 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1%Best | 38.4% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 21, 2013 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 24, 2013 to Oct 13, 2026 (13.3 years).
IVV vs XYLD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs XYLD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IVV returned +18.70% while XYLD returned +18.43%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.84% versus a gain of 11.48% for XYLD.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.93% per year against +13.41% for XYLD; over five years the annualized figures are +13.91% and +7.93% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.41% annualized vs +5.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 11.1% for XYLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -34.7% for XYLD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XYLD charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 10.44% for XYLD.
Holdings Overlap
98.6% of IVV's money is in holdings XYLD also owns. 99.1% of XYLD's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of XYLD is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
487 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 494 in XYLD, against full books of 508 and 1,014.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 5 positions for XYLD that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.6% of the fund), and 12 for IVV that do not appear in XYLD (0.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in XYLD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.00% | 8.05% | 0.05% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.39% | 7.43% | 0.04% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.57% | 5.61% | 0.04% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.80% | 3.83% | 0.03% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 3.02% | 0.02% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.59% | 2.61% | 0.02% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.40% | 2.41% | 0.01% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.15% | 2.17% | 0.02% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.01% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 1.57% | 0.01% |
99.1% of XYLD is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XYLD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XYLD charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or XYLD?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.70% vs +18.43% for XYLD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), IVV annualized +13.41% vs +5.08% for XYLD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or XYLD?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 11.1% for XYLD. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs XYLD -34.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and XYLD?
IVV and XYLD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XYLD?
99.1% of XYLD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 99.1% of XYLD's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 487 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 494 in XYLD.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XYLD?
IVV yields 1.06% while XYLD yields 10.44%, so XYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XYLD better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.