IVVM vs QLTY
iShares Large Cap Moderate Quarterly Laddered ETF vs GMO US Quality ETF
Which is better, IVVM or QLTY?
QLTY has been ahead.
QLTY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVVM | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $190M | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 13 | 90 |
| YTD Return | +9.19% | +14.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.61% | +20.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.42% | +21.84%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.0%Best | 11.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.6%Best | -17.0% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $14,626 | $17,733Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | GMO |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 28, 2023 | Nov 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 15, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
IVVM vs QLTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
IVVM vs QLTY Performance
iShares Large Cap Moderate Quarterly Laddered ETF (IVVM) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO. Over the past year IVVM returned +11.61% while QLTY returned +20.95%. Year to date, IVVM is up 9.19% versus a gain of 14.13% for QLTY.
Over three years, IVVM compounded at +14.42% per year against +21.84% for QLTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QLTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 6.0% for IVVM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.6% for IVVM and -17.0% for QLTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVVM charges 0.50% per year while QLTY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, IVVM currently yields 0.57% against 0.66% for QLTY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in IVVM and 45 in QLTY, totalling 99.1% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in IVVM and 45 in QLTY, against full books of 13 and 90.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVVM and QLTY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVVM or QLTY?
IVVM has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QLTY charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, IVVM or QLTY?
Over the past year IVVM returned +11.61% vs +20.95% for QLTY, so QLTY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVVM or QLTY?
QLTY has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 6.0% for IVVM. Worst drawdown: IVVM -11.6% vs QLTY -17.0%.
Should I hold both IVVM and QLTY?
IVVM and QLTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVVM or QLTY?
IVVM yields 0.57% while QLTY yields 0.66%, so QLTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLTY better than IVVM?
QLTY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.