IVW vs QDVO
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF vs Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
Which is better, IVW or QDVO?
Nearly the same fund. IVW costs less.
IVW has a lower expense ratio. IVW led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. QDVO is less concentrated, with 57.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVW | QDVO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.56% |
| AUM | $80.0B | $787M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 11.44% |
| Holdings | 152 | 97 |
| YTD Return | +15.30%Best | +11.49% |
| 1Y Return | +18.81%Best | +14.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.93% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.96% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1% | -18.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $15,301Best | $14,727 |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.0% | 57.9%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Amplify ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 22, 2000 | Aug 22, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 22, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
IVW vs QDVO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
IVW vs QDVO Performance
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year IVW returned +18.81% while QDVO returned +14.59%. Year to date, IVW is up 15.30% versus a gain of 11.49% for QDVO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 13.3% for QDVO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for IVW and -18.6% for QDVO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVW charges 0.18% per year while QDVO charges 0.56%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $56 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVW currently yields 0.34% against 11.44% for QDVO.
Holdings Overlap
69.2% of IVW's money is in holdings QDVO also owns. 81.3% of QDVO's money is in holdings IVW also owns.
Most of QDVO is already inside IVW. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
24 positions in common, counted across the 152 positions we hold weights for in IVW and 40 in QDVO, against full books of 152 and 97.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 16 positions for QDVO that do not appear in our book for IVW (19.9% of the fund), and 126 for IVW that do not appear in QDVO (30.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVW | Weight in QDVO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 15.13% | 10.80% | 4.33% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 10.31% | 6.00% | 4.31% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.53% | 9.01% | 2.48% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.37% | 8.14% | 2.77% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.50% | 5.09% | 1.59% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.33% | 3.95% | 0.38% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.36% | 4.53% | 1.17% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.43% | 3.33% | 1.10% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.72% | 3.75% | 1.03% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.49% | 3.34% | 0.85% |
81.3% of QDVO is already inside IVW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVW or QDVO?
IVW has an expense ratio of 0.18% while QDVO charges 0.56%. IVW is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVW or QDVO?
Over the past year IVW returned +18.81% vs +14.59% for QDVO, so IVW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVW annualized +22.45% vs +20.24% for QDVO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVW or QDVO?
IVW has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 13.3% for QDVO. Worst drawdown: IVW -22.1% vs QDVO -18.6%.
Should I hold both IVW and QDVO?
IVW and QDVO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVW and QDVO?
81.3% of QDVO's money is in holdings IVW also owns. 81.3% of QDVO's is in holdings IVW also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 152 positions we hold weights for in IVW and 40 in QDVO.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVW or QDVO?
IVW yields 0.34% while QDVO yields 11.44%, so QDVO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QDVO better than IVW?
IVW has a lower expense ratio. IVW led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. QDVO is less concentrated, with 57.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.