IWD vs JDVL
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF vs John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF
Which is better, IWD or JDVL?
IWD has been ahead.
IWD has a lower expense ratio. IWD led over 1Y and the full window. IWD is less concentrated, with 29.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IWD | JDVL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.56% |
| AUM | $83.2B | $948M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.43% | 1.48% |
| Holdings | 869 | 41 |
| YTD Return | +21.07%Best | +15.90% |
| 1Y Return | +27.09%Best | +21.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.91% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.56% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.9%Best | 12.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -6.8%Best | -9.2% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $13,360Best | $12,918 |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.7%Best | 40.0% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | John Hancock Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 22, 2000 | Aug 6, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 6, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.2 years).
IWD vs JDVL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
IWD vs JDVL Performance
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF (JDVL) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Over the past year IWD returned +27.09% while JDVL returned +21.37%. Year to date, IWD is up 21.07% versus a gain of 15.90% for JDVL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JDVL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 10.9% for IWD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.8% for IWD and -9.2% for JDVL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IWD charges 0.18% per year while JDVL charges 0.56%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $56 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWD currently yields 1.43% against 1.48% for JDVL.
Holdings Overlap
21.4% of IWD's money is in holdings JDVL also owns. 68.0% of JDVL's money is in holdings IWD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
26 positions in common, counted across the 871 positions we hold weights for in IWD and 39 in JDVL, against full books of 869 and 41.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for JDVL that do not appear in our book for IWD (23.5% of the fund), and 767 for IWD that do not appear in JDVL (77.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IWD | Weight in JDVL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.06% | 7.48% | 1.42% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.23% | 5.77% | 0.54% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.45% | 4.03% | 1.58% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.80% | 3.89% | 3.09% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.81% | 3.17% | 2.36% |
| USFDUS Foods Holding Corp | 0.06% | 3.78% | 3.72% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.16% | 2.19% | 1.03% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.50% | 2.77% | 2.27% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 0.58% | 2.65% | 2.07% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 0.32% | 2.32% | 2.00% |
68.0% of JDVL is already inside IWD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IWD or JDVL?
IWD has an expense ratio of 0.18% while JDVL charges 0.56%. IWD is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IWD or JDVL?
Over the past year IWD returned +27.09% vs +21.37% for JDVL, so IWD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IWD annualized +27.30% vs +23.78% for JDVL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IWD or JDVL?
JDVL has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 10.9% for IWD. Worst drawdown: IWD -6.8% vs JDVL -9.2%.
Should I hold both IWD and JDVL?
IWD and JDVL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IWD and JDVL?
68.0% of JDVL's money is in holdings IWD also owns. 68.0% of JDVL's is in holdings IWD also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 871 positions we hold weights for in IWD and 39 in JDVL.
Which pays a higher dividend, IWD or JDVL?
IWD yields 1.43% while JDVL yields 1.48%, so JDVL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JDVL better than IWD?
IWD has a lower expense ratio. IWD led over 1Y and the full window. IWD is less concentrated, with 29.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.