IWD vs MAVF
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Which is better, IWD or MAVF?
Each has led over a different period.
IWD has a lower expense ratio. IWD led over 1Y, MAVF over the full window. IWD is less concentrated, with 29.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IWD | MAVF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $83.2B | $93M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.43% | 0.37% |
| Holdings | 869 | 29 |
| YTD Return | +21.07%Best | +13.01% |
| 1Y Return | +27.09%Best | +19.46% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.91% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.56% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7%Best | 14.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.8%Best | -16.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,475 | $13,491Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.7%Best | 54.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Matrix Asset Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 22, 2000 | Sep 16, 1983 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.6 years).
IWD vs MAVF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
IWD vs MAVF Performance
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors. Over the past year IWD returned +27.09% while MAVF returned +19.46%. Year to date, IWD is up 21.07% versus a gain of 13.01% for MAVF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 10.7% for IWD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for IWD and -16.4% for MAVF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IWD charges 0.18% per year while MAVF charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $75 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWD currently yields 1.43% against 0.37% for MAVF.
Holdings Overlap
26.4% of IWD's money is in holdings MAVF also owns. 82.3% of MAVF's money is in holdings IWD also owns.
Most of MAVF is already inside IWD. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
22 positions in common, counted across the 871 positions we hold weights for in IWD and 27 in MAVF, against full books of 869 and 29.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 871 and 27 positions we hold weights for.
IWD holds 771 positions MAVF does not, 72.1% of the fund.
Largest: BRK.A 2.56%, XOM 1.85%, JNJ 1.71%, INTC 1.50%, CSCO 1.18%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IWD | Weight in MAVF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.23% | 8.61% | 3.38% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.01% | 7.06% | 1.05% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.06% | 6.38% | 0.32% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.80% | 5.73% | 4.93% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.45% | 3.19% | 0.74% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.53% | 3.98% | 3.45% |
| GNRCGenerac Holdings, Inc. | 0.03% | 4.35% | 4.32% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 0.67% | 3.34% | 2.67% |
| MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.30% | 3.54% | 3.24% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.41% | 3.13% | 2.72% |
82.3% of MAVF is already inside IWD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IWD or MAVF?
IWD has an expense ratio of 0.18% while MAVF charges 0.75%. IWD is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IWD or MAVF?
Over the past year IWD returned +27.09% vs +19.46% for MAVF, so IWD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IWD annualized +20.49% vs +20.58% for MAVF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IWD or MAVF?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 10.7% for IWD. Worst drawdown: IWD -13.8% vs MAVF -16.4%.
Should I hold both IWD and MAVF?
IWD and MAVF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IWD and MAVF?
82.3% of MAVF's money is in holdings IWD also owns. 82.3% of MAVF's is in holdings IWD also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 871 positions we hold weights for in IWD and 27 in MAVF.
Which pays a higher dividend, IWD or MAVF?
IWD yields 1.43% while MAVF yields 0.37%, so IWD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MAVF better than IWD?
IWD has a lower expense ratio. IWD led over 1Y, MAVF over the full window. IWD is less concentrated, with 29.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.