IWD vs SASS
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF vs M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF
Which is better, IWD or SASS?
IWD costs less.
IWD has a lower expense ratio. IWD is less concentrated, with 29.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IWD | SASS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $83.2B | $76M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.43% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 869 | 24 |
| YTD Return | +21.07%Best | -7.30% |
| 1Y Return | +27.09% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.91% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.56% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.7%Best | 57.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | MD Sass |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 22, 2000 | Mar 4, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IWD vs SASS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IWD vs SASS Performance
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) is an ETF from MD Sass. Year to date, IWD is up 21.07% versus a loss of 7.30% for SASS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IWD charges 0.18% per year while SASS charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $75 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWD currently yields 1.43% against 0.00% for SASS.
Holdings Overlap
8.3% of IWD's money is in holdings SASS also owns. 89.8% of SASS's money is in holdings IWD also owns.
Most of SASS is already inside IWD. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 871 positions we hold weights for in IWD and 22 in SASS, against full books of 869 and 24.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 871 and 22 positions we hold weights for.
IWD holds 774 positions SASS does not, 90.2% of the fund.
Largest: AAPL 6.01%, MSFT 5.23%, BRK.A 2.56%, JPM 2.45%, XOM 1.85%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IWD | Weight in SASS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.06% | 5.98% | 0.08% |
| HSICHenry Schein Inc | 0.02% | 6.47% | 6.45% |
| AMEAmetek Inc | 0.16% | 6.01% | 5.85% |
| CLHClean Harbors Inc | 0.04% | 6.05% | 6.01% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 0.32% | 5.71% | 5.39% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.50% | 5.43% | 4.93% |
| KNXKnight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc | 0.03% | 5.68% | 5.65% |
| PRMBPrimo Brands Corp | 0.01% | 5.62% | 5.61% |
| DGXQuest Diagnostics Inc | 0.07% | 5.47% | 5.40% |
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 0.45% | 4.74% | 4.29% |
89.8% of SASS is already inside IWD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IWD or SASS?
IWD has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SASS charges 0.75%. IWD is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IWD and SASS?
89.8% of SASS's money is in holdings IWD also owns. 89.8% of SASS's is in holdings IWD also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 871 positions we hold weights for in IWD and 22 in SASS.
Which pays a higher dividend, IWD or SASS?
IWD yields 1.43% while SASS yields 0.00%, so IWD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SASS better than IWD?
IWD has a lower expense ratio. IWD is less concentrated, with 29.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.