IWD vs VMAX
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF vs Hartford US Value ETF
Which is better, IWD or VMAX?
Nearly the same fund. IWD costs less.
IWD has a lower expense ratio. IWD led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. VMAX is less concentrated, with 19.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IWD | VMAX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.29% |
| AUM | $83.2B | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.43% | 2.17% |
| Holdings | 869 | 127 |
| YTD Return | +21.07%Best | +16.66% |
| 1Y Return | +27.09%Best | +21.02% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.91% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.56% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.6%Best | 12.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7%Best | -19.1% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $17,145Best | $16,927 |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.7% | 19.0%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Hartford Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 22, 2000 | Dec 5, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 6, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
IWD vs VMAX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
IWD vs VMAX Performance
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) is an ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year IWD returned +27.09% while VMAX returned +21.02%. Year to date, IWD is up 21.07% versus a gain of 16.66% for VMAX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VMAX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 11.6% for IWD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for IWD and -19.1% for VMAX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IWD charges 0.18% per year while VMAX charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $29 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWD currently yields 1.43% against 2.17% for VMAX.
Holdings Overlap
47.3% of IWD's money is in holdings VMAX also owns. 85.9% of VMAX's money is in holdings IWD also owns.
Most of VMAX is already inside IWD. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
111 positions in common, counted across the 871 positions we hold weights for in IWD and 125 in VMAX, against full books of 869 and 127.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 12 positions for VMAX that do not appear in our book for IWD (12.9% of the fund), and 682 for IWD that do not appear in VMAX (51.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IWD | Weight in VMAX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.01% | 1.32% | 4.69% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.06% | 0.59% | 5.47% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.23% | 0.31% | 4.92% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.45% | 0.97% | 1.48% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 1.85% | 1.06% | 0.79% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.80% | 1.98% | 1.18% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.71% | 0.89% | 0.82% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.98% | 1.29% | 0.31% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.34% | 1.91% | 1.57% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.21% | 2.01% | 1.80% |
85.9% of VMAX is already inside IWD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IWD or VMAX?
IWD has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VMAX charges 0.29%. IWD is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IWD or VMAX?
Over the past year IWD returned +27.09% vs +21.02% for VMAX, so IWD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IWD or VMAX?
VMAX has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 11.6% for IWD. Worst drawdown: IWD -15.7% vs VMAX -19.1%.
Should I hold both IWD and VMAX?
IWD and VMAX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IWD and VMAX?
85.9% of VMAX's money is in holdings IWD also owns. 85.9% of VMAX's is in holdings IWD also owns. They hold 111 positions in common, counted across the 871 positions we hold weights for in IWD and 125 in VMAX.
Which pays a higher dividend, IWD or VMAX?
IWD yields 1.43% while VMAX yields 2.17%, so VMAX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VMAX better than IWD?
IWD has a lower expense ratio. IWD led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. VMAX is less concentrated, with 19.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.