IWMY vs PAPR
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF vs Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - April
Which is better, IWMY or PAPR?
PAPR has been ahead.
PAPR has a lower expense ratio. PAPR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IWMY | PAPR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $83M | $964M |
| Dividend Yield | 39.40% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +4.37% | +10.66%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.60% | +13.12%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -3.29% | +11.87%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.43% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 5.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.7% | -11.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $9,045 | $14,421Best |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2023 | Mar 29, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 31, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
IWMY vs PAPR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
IWMY vs PAPR Performance
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IWMY returned +1.60% while PAPR returned +13.12%. Year to date, IWMY is up 4.37% versus a gain of 10.66% for PAPR.
Over three years, IWMY compounded at -3.29% per year against +11.87% for PAPR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IWMY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 5.9% for PAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.7% for IWMY and -11.9% for PAPR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IWMY charges 1.05% per year while PAPR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $79 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWMY currently yields 39.40% against 0.00% for PAPR.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IWMY and PAPR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IWMY or PAPR?
IWMY has an expense ratio of 1.05% while PAPR charges 0.79%. PAPR is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IWMY or PAPR?
Over the past year IWMY returned +1.60% vs +13.12% for PAPR, so PAPR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IWMY or PAPR?
IWMY has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 5.9% for PAPR. Worst drawdown: IWMY -35.7% vs PAPR -11.9%.
Should I hold both IWMY and PAPR?
IWMY and PAPR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IWMY or PAPR?
IWMY yields 39.40% while PAPR yields 0.00%, so IWMY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PAPR better than IWMY?
PAPR has a lower expense ratio. PAPR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.