JANH vs MSTY

JANH vs MSTY

Which is better, JANH or MSTY?

Each has led over a different period.

JANH has a lower expense ratio. JANH led over 1Y, MSTY over the full window.

Lower Fees: JANHHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJANHMSTY
Expense Ratio0.79%Best1.03%
AUM$12M$1.1B
Dividend Yield6.25%140.54%
Holdings1928
YTD Return+0.85%Best-10.02%
1Y Return+0.12%Best-46.73%
Volatility (annualized)4.3%Best78.6%
Max Drawdown-10.4%Best-77.4%
$10,000 over 2.6 years$9,914$15,819Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustYieldMax ETF
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionJan 2, 2024Feb 21, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 22, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.6 years).

JANH vs MSTY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare JANH against instead:JANH vs SPYJANH vs QQQJANH vs VOOJANH vs VTIMSTY against:MSTY vs VXUS

JANH vs MSTY Performance

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year JANH returned +0.12% while MSTY returned -46.73%. Year to date, JANH is up 0.85% versus a loss of 10.02% for MSTY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MSTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 78.6% compared with 4.3% for JANH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.4% for JANH and -77.4% for MSTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.10. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JANH charges 0.79% per year while MSTY charges 1.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $103 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JANH currently yields 6.25% against 140.54% for MSTY.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of JANH and MSTY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

JANHMSTY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JANH or MSTY?

JANH has an expense ratio of 0.79% while MSTY charges 1.03%. JANH is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, JANH or MSTY?

Over the past year JANH returned +0.12% vs -46.73% for MSTY, so JANH leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, JANH or MSTY?

MSTY has been the more volatile fund at 78.6% annualized versus 4.3% for JANH. Worst drawdown: JANH -10.4% vs MSTY -77.4%.

Should I hold both JANH and MSTY?

JANH and MSTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.10, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, JANH or MSTY?

JANH yields 6.25% while MSTY yields 140.54%, so MSTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is MSTY better than JANH?

JANH has a lower expense ratio. JANH led over 1Y, MSTY over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.