JANH vs YMAX

JANH vs YMAX

Which is better, JANH or YMAX?

Each has led over a different period.

JANH has a lower expense ratio. JANH led over 1Y, YMAX over the full window.

Lower Fees: JANHHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJANHYMAX
Expense Ratio0.79%Best1.33%
AUM$12M$367M
Dividend Yield6.25%66.30%
Holdings1960
YTD Return+0.87%+8.41%Best
1Y Return+0.20%Best-1.48%
Volatility (annualized)4.3%Best19.8%
Max Drawdown-10.4%Best-26.1%
$10,000 over 2.7 years$10,065$14,543Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustYieldMax ETF
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionJan 2, 2024Jan 16, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 17, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026 (2.7 years).

JANH vs YMAX growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare JANH against instead:JANH vs SPYJANH vs QQQJANH vs VOOJANH vs VTIYMAX against:YMAX vs VXUS

JANH vs YMAX Performance

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETF (YMAX) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year JANH returned +0.20% while YMAX returned -1.48%. Year to date, JANH is up 0.87% versus a gain of 8.41% for YMAX.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

YMAX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 4.3% for JANH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.4% for JANH and -26.1% for YMAX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JANH charges 0.79% per year while YMAX charges 1.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $133 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JANH currently yields 6.25% against 66.30% for YMAX.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of JANH and YMAX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

JANHYMAX

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JANH or YMAX?

JANH has an expense ratio of 0.79% while YMAX charges 1.33%. JANH is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, JANH or YMAX?

Over the past year JANH returned +0.20% vs -1.48% for YMAX, so JANH leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, JANH or YMAX?

YMAX has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 4.3% for JANH. Worst drawdown: JANH -10.4% vs YMAX -26.1%.

Should I hold both JANH and YMAX?

JANH and YMAX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, JANH or YMAX?

JANH yields 6.25% while YMAX yields 66.30%, so YMAX currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is YMAX better than JANH?

JANH has a lower expense ratio. JANH led over 1Y, YMAX over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.