JANJ vs PAPR
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January vs Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - April
Which is better, JANJ or PAPR?
PAPR has been ahead.
PAPR led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JANJ | PAPR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Tie | 0.79%Tie |
| AUM | $14M | $964M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.03% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 19 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +0.61% | +10.66%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.08% | +13.12%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.43% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.0%Best | 5.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -7.6%Best | -11.9% |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $10,079 | $13,320Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2024 | Mar 29, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.8 years).
JANJ vs PAPR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
JANJ vs PAPR Performance
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January (JANJ) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year JANJ returned +0.08% while PAPR returned +13.12%. Year to date, JANJ is up 0.61% versus a gain of 10.66% for PAPR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PAPR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.4% compared with 3.0% for JANJ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.6% for JANJ and -11.9% for PAPR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JANJ charges 0.79% per year while PAPR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, JANJ currently yields 5.03% against 0.00% for PAPR.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of JANJ and PAPR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JANJ or PAPR?
JANJ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while PAPR charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, JANJ or PAPR?
Over the past year JANJ returned +0.08% vs +13.12% for PAPR, so PAPR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JANJ or PAPR?
PAPR has been the more volatile fund at 5.4% annualized versus 3.0% for JANJ. Worst drawdown: JANJ -7.6% vs PAPR -11.9%.
Should I hold both JANJ and PAPR?
JANJ and PAPR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, JANJ or PAPR?
JANJ yields 5.03% while PAPR yields 0.00%, so JANJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PAPR better than JANJ?
PAPR led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.