JANJ vs TSLY

JANJ vs TSLY

Which is better, JANJ or TSLY?

Each has led over a different period.

JANJ has a lower expense ratio. JANJ led over 1Y, TSLY over the full window.

Lower Fees: JANJHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJANJTSLY
Expense Ratio0.79%Best1.07%
AUM$14M$677M
Dividend Yield5.03%99.27%
Holdings1934
YTD Return+0.61%Best-12.87%
1Y Return+0.08%Best-9.45%
3Y Return (annualized)-+6.07%
Volatility (annualized)3.0%Best40.2%
Max Drawdown-7.6%Best-49.5%
$10,000 over 2.8 years$10,079$12,328Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustYieldMax ETF
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionJan 2, 2024Nov 22, 2022

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.8 years).

JANJ vs TSLY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare JANJ against instead:JANJ vs SPYJANJ vs QQQJANJ vs VOOJANJ vs VTITSLY against:TSLY vs VXUS

JANJ vs TSLY Performance

Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January (JANJ) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year JANJ returned +0.08% while TSLY returned -9.45%. Year to date, JANJ is up 0.61% versus a loss of 12.87% for TSLY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TSLY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.2% compared with 3.0% for JANJ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.6% for JANJ and -49.5% for TSLY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.16. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JANJ charges 0.79% per year while TSLY charges 1.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $107 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JANJ currently yields 5.03% against 99.27% for TSLY.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of JANJ and TSLY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

JANJTSLY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JANJ or TSLY?

JANJ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while TSLY charges 1.07%. JANJ is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, JANJ or TSLY?

Over the past year JANJ returned +0.08% vs -9.45% for TSLY, so JANJ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, JANJ or TSLY?

TSLY has been the more volatile fund at 40.2% annualized versus 3.0% for JANJ. Worst drawdown: JANJ -7.6% vs TSLY -49.5%.

Should I hold both JANJ and TSLY?

JANJ and TSLY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.16, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, JANJ or TSLY?

JANJ yields 5.03% while TSLY yields 99.27%, so TSLY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TSLY better than JANJ?

JANJ has a lower expense ratio. JANJ led over 1Y, TSLY over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.