JANZ vs JUNP
TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF vs PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June
Which is better, JANZ or JUNP?
JANZ has been ahead.
JUNP has a lower expense ratio. JANZ led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JANZ | JUNP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $42M | $99M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.30% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 32 | 6 |
| YTD Return | +9.88%Best | +6.14% |
| 1Y Return | +10.64%Best | +9.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.48% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.90% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.0% | 5.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.3% | -11.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $13,332Best | $13,042 |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2020 | May 31, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 3, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
JANZ vs JUNP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
JANZ vs JUNP Performance
TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) is an ETF from TrueShares and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June (JUNP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year JANZ returned +10.64% while JUNP returned +9.00%. Year to date, JANZ is up 9.88% versus a gain of 6.14% for JUNP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JANZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.0% compared with 5.8% for JUNP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.3% for JANZ and -11.2% for JUNP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JANZ charges 0.80% per year while JUNP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $50 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JANZ currently yields 1.30% against 0.00% for JUNP.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of JANZ and JUNP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JANZ or JUNP?
JANZ has an expense ratio of 0.80% while JUNP charges 0.50%. JUNP is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JANZ or JUNP?
Over the past year JANZ returned +10.64% vs +9.00% for JUNP, so JANZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), JANZ annualized +12.73% vs +11.70% for JUNP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JANZ or JUNP?
JANZ has been the more volatile fund at 9.0% annualized versus 5.8% for JUNP. Worst drawdown: JANZ -14.3% vs JUNP -11.2%.
Should I hold both JANZ and JUNP?
JANZ and JUNP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, JANZ or JUNP?
JANZ yields 1.30% while JUNP yields 0.00%, so JANZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JUNP better than JANZ?
JUNP has a lower expense ratio. JANZ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.