JAVA vs JLVP

JAVA vs JLVP

Which is better, JAVA or JLVP?

JAVA costs less.

JAVA has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: JAVA

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJAVAJLVP
Expense Ratio0.44%Best1.05%
AUM$7.4B$28M
Dividend Yield1.19%0.00%
Holdings153154
YTD Return+13.15%Best+1.10%
1Y Return+20.54%-
3Y Return (annualized)+18.31%-
5Y Return (annualized)+11.63%-
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementJ.P. Morgan Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 4, 2021Jul 30, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

JAVA vs JLVP growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare JAVA against instead:JAVA vs SPYJAVA vs QQQJAVA vs VOOJAVA vs VTIJLVP against:JLVP vs VXUS

JAVA vs JLVP Performance

JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and JPMorgan US Large Cap Value Plus ETF (JLVP) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Year to date, JAVA is up 13.15% versus a gain of 1.10% for JLVP.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JAVA charges 0.44% per year while JLVP charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $105 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JAVA currently yields 1.19% against 0.00% for JLVP.

Holdings Overlap

JAVA already in JLVP77.2%

At least 77.2% of JAVA's money is in holdings JLVP also owns.

Only one direction is shown: for JLVP, our book for it lists positions totalling 132.0% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.

Most of JAVA is already inside JLVP. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

95 positions in common, counted across the 151 positions we hold weights for in JAVA and 153 in JLVP, against full books of 153 and 154.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in JAVAWeight in JLVPDifference
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc7.63%8.99%1.36%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp_None_06.29%6.60%0.31%
AAPLApple Inc3.41%2.59%0.82%
JIMXXJpmorgan Prime Money1.23%3.90%2.67%
BACBank Amer Secs Inc2.19%2.71%0.52%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.1.60%3.27%1.67%
WFCWells Fargo And Co Preferred Stock Var2.13%2.30%0.17%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.1.77%1.72%0.05%
COPConocophillips1.77%1.55%0.22%
EQRVivmark Residential0.73%2.39%1.66%

77.2% of JAVA is already inside JLVP.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

JAVAJLVP

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JAVA or JLVP?

JAVA has an expense ratio of 0.44% while JLVP charges 1.05%. JAVA is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between JAVA and JLVP?

At least 77.2% of JAVA's money is in holdings JLVP also owns. Our book for JLVP is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 95 positions in common, counted across the 151 positions we hold weights for in JAVA and 153 in JLVP.

Which pays a higher dividend, JAVA or JLVP?

JAVA yields 1.19% while JLVP yields 0.00%, so JAVA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JLVP better than JAVA?

JAVA has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.