JAVA vs MAVF
JPMorgan Active Value ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Which is better, JAVA or MAVF?
Each has led over a different period.
JAVA has a lower expense ratio. JAVA led over 1Y, MAVF over the full window. JAVA is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JAVA | MAVF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $7.4B | $93M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 0.37% |
| Holdings | 153 | 29 |
| YTD Return | +13.15%Best | +13.01% |
| 1Y Return | +20.54%Best | +19.46% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.31% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.63% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2%Best | 14.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.7%Best | -16.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $12,647 | $13,491Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.8%Best | 54.6% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Matrix Asset Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 4, 2021 | Sep 16, 1983 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.6 years).
JAVA vs MAVF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
JAVA vs MAVF Performance
JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors. Over the past year JAVA returned +20.54% while MAVF returned +19.46%. Year to date, JAVA is up 13.15% versus a gain of 13.01% for MAVF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 10.2% for JAVA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.7% for JAVA and -16.4% for MAVF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JAVA charges 0.44% per year while MAVF charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $75 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JAVA currently yields 1.19% against 0.37% for MAVF.
Holdings Overlap
26.3% of JAVA's money is in holdings MAVF also owns. 59.2% of MAVF's money is in holdings JAVA also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
14 positions in common, counted across the 151 positions we hold weights for in JAVA and 27 in MAVF, against full books of 153 and 29.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 151 and 27 positions we hold weights for.
JAVA holds 136 positions MAVF does not, 73.4% of the fund.
Largest: BAC 2.19%, COP 1.77%, ABBV 1.77%, SCHW 1.65%, C 1.39%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JAVA | Weight in MAVF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.29% | 8.61% | 2.32% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.63% | 6.38% | 1.25% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.41% | 7.06% | 3.65% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.36% | 7.81% | 7.45% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.60% | 5.73% | 4.13% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 2.13% | 3.34% | 1.21% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 1.26% | 2.73% | 1.47% |
| LOWLowes Cos., Inc. | 0.64% | 3.21% | 2.57% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 0.94% | 2.72% | 1.78% |
| USBUS Bancorp | 0.44% | 2.87% | 2.43% |
59.2% of MAVF is already inside JAVA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JAVA or MAVF?
JAVA has an expense ratio of 0.44% while MAVF charges 0.75%. JAVA is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JAVA or MAVF?
Over the past year JAVA returned +20.54% vs +19.46% for MAVF, so JAVA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), JAVA annualized +15.81% vs +20.58% for MAVF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JAVA or MAVF?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 10.2% for JAVA. Worst drawdown: JAVA -13.7% vs MAVF -16.4%.
Should I hold both JAVA and MAVF?
JAVA and MAVF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between JAVA and MAVF?
59.2% of MAVF's money is in holdings JAVA also owns. 59.2% of MAVF's is in holdings JAVA also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 151 positions we hold weights for in JAVA and 27 in MAVF.
Which pays a higher dividend, JAVA or MAVF?
JAVA yields 1.19% while MAVF yields 0.37%, so JAVA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MAVF better than JAVA?
JAVA has a lower expense ratio. JAVA led over 1Y, MAVF over the full window. JAVA is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.