JCTR vs QLV
JPMorgan Carbon Transition US Equity ETF vs Northern Trust US Quality Low Volatility ETF
Which is better, JCTR or QLV?
JCTR has been ahead.
QLV has a lower expense ratio. JCTR led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JCTR | QLV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.08%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $171M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% | 1.50% |
| Holdings | 405 | 125 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 12.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.8% | -17.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $19,380Best | $17,399 |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Northern Trust Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2020 | Jul 15, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 376 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. JCTR has data through Oct 3, 2025 and QLV through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 10, 2020 to Oct 3, 2025 (4.8 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JCTR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 12.5% for QLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.8% for JCTR and -17.9% for QLV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JCTR charges 0.15% per year while QLV charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $8 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JCTR currently yields 0.94% against 1.50% for QLV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of JCTR and QLV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JCTR or QLV?
JCTR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while QLV charges 0.08%. QLV is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, JCTR or QLV?
JCTR has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 12.5% for QLV. Worst drawdown: JCTR -24.8% vs QLV -17.9%.
Should I hold both JCTR and QLV?
JCTR and QLV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, JCTR or QLV?
JCTR yields 0.94% while QLV yields 1.50%, so QLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLV better than JCTR?
QLV has a lower expense ratio. JCTR led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.