JCTR vs RECS
JPMorgan Carbon Transition US Equity ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Which is better, JCTR or RECS?
Each has led over a different period.
JCTR led over 1Y, RECS over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JCTR | RECS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Tie | 0.15%Tie |
| AUM | $7M | $6.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% | 1.01% |
| Holdings | 405 | 718 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.8% | -22.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $19,380 | $20,952Best |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2020 | Sep 25, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 376 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. JCTR has data through Oct 3, 2025 and RECS through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 10, 2020 to Oct 3, 2025 (4.8 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JCTR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 14.8% for RECS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.8% for JCTR and -22.1% for RECS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JCTR charges 0.15% per year while RECS charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $15 annually. On income, JCTR currently yields 0.94% against 1.01% for RECS.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of JCTR and RECS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JCTR or RECS?
JCTR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while RECS charges 0.15%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which is riskier, JCTR or RECS?
JCTR has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 14.8% for RECS. Worst drawdown: JCTR -24.8% vs RECS -22.1%.
Should I hold both JCTR and RECS?
JCTR and RECS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, JCTR or RECS?
JCTR yields 0.94% while RECS yields 1.01%, so RECS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RECS better than JCTR?
JCTR led over 1Y, RECS over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.