JDVI vs MIVL

JDVI vs MIVL

Which is better, JDVI or MIVL?

MIVL costs less.

MIVL has a lower expense ratio. MIVL is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.0%.

Lower Fees: MIVLLess Concentrated: MIVL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJDVIMIVL
Expense Ratio0.69%0.57%Best
AUM$795M$22M
Dividend Yield2.14%0.00%
Holdings4466
YTD Return+11.38%Best-0.13%
1Y Return+19.68%-
Top 10 Weight42.0%29.8%Best
Fund FamilyJohn Hancock Investment ManagementMFS Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionDec 19, 2023Jun 4, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

JDVI vs MIVL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare JDVI against instead:JDVI vs SPYJDVI vs QQQJDVI vs VOOJDVI vs VTIMIVL against:MIVL vs VXUS

JDVI vs MIVL Performance

John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF (JDVI) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and MFS Active International Value ETF (MIVL) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management. Year to date, JDVI is up 11.38% versus a loss of 0.13% for MIVL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JDVI charges 0.69% per year while MIVL charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $57 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JDVI currently yields 2.14% against 0.00% for MIVL.

Holdings Overlap

JDVI already in MIVL14.8%
MIVL already in JDVI11.8%

14.8% of JDVI's money is in holdings MIVL also owns. 11.8% of MIVL's money is in holdings JDVI also owns.

JDVI and MIVL share little of their money.

6 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in JDVI and 62 in MIVL, against full books of 44 and 66.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 4 positions for MIVL that do not appear in our book for JDVI (3.3% of the fund), and 2 for JDVI that do not appear in MIVL (3.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in JDVIWeight in MIVLDifference
NWG:LNNatWest Group PLC3.31%4.36%1.05%
6501:JPHitachi Ltd4.36%1.76%2.60%
8308:JPResona Holdings, Inc. Com Stk3.18%1.40%1.78%
TSCO:LNTesco Plc Common Stock Gbp.06333331.59%2.11%0.52%
BAES:LNBae Systems Plc2.29%1.09%1.20%
005930:KRSamsung Electronics Ltd.0.10%1.03%0.93%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of JDVI and MIVL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

JDVIMIVL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JDVI or MIVL?

JDVI has an expense ratio of 0.69% while MIVL charges 0.57%. MIVL is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between JDVI and MIVL?

14.8% of JDVI's money is in holdings MIVL also owns. 11.8% of MIVL's is in holdings JDVI also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in JDVI and 62 in MIVL.

Which pays a higher dividend, JDVI or MIVL?

JDVI yields 2.14% while MIVL yields 0.00%, so JDVI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is MIVL better than JDVI?

MIVL has a lower expense ratio. MIVL is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.